Friday, February 12, 2010

Support TEAM USA

OK - so you are a big fan of MMA and maybe of other combat sports, but the 2010 Winter Olympics are upon us and our Nation has some amazing athletes representing us this year. Please consider supporting them - at least in spirit. Who knows? Maybe for 2014, they will have a modified Biathlon in which they replace rifle shooting with defending against submission attempts and punching people in the face. I'd definitely tune in.

Team USA's dreams are on the line! We're in the final countdown to the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games! With just weeks to go before our athletes take the world's stage in Vancouver, your support of Team USA right now makes a difference.

Each
Team USA athlete and hopeful has been training hard and dreaming big, waiting to realize their long-held ambition of Olympic and Paralympic competition. There are so many ways to help them get there! Make a donation, become a member the Sixth Ring, or cheer on Team USA in person in Vancouver.
Go
Team USA!

Follow Team USA
here and get insider info from your favorite athletes and sports.

Keep up to date with the latest
news about Team USA and the 2010 Olympic
Winter Games.

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

UK Athletics Elite Endurance Training Day - Mile End 25/1/2010

So again, a while since I last wrote on the blog. I've got about 10 pieces of work to write up for Sport Psychology accreditation in the next few weeks, which is taking up more of my time. But thought I'd stick up my write up of my day's workshop at UK Athletics Endurance Training day this Sunday as it was so inspiring and broad enough to be of interest to many.

I snuck in as a coach at my club and claiming my Sport Psych credentials. Talking to the group of elite standard runners and coaches from the South-East was Bud Baldaro (above) and Bruce Tulloh. In their field of Endurance coaching in the UK over the last 30 years, the two of them have plenty to be proud of. Bud is the UK Athletics Marathon Coach, who has coached Olympians, Commonwealth medallists and World champions. Whilst Bruce coached Mike Boit, a Commonwealth Games Gold Medallist at 800m and the African record holder for the Mile, and Richard Nerurkar who was Britain's leading distance runner in the Nineties. Richard won the World Cup Marathon in 1993. Not only that, Bruce himself broke the record for running from Los Angeles to New York in 1969 running 3000 miles in just under 65 days, reducing the previous record by 8 days. His last serious marathon was completed in 2hrs 47 in London, 1994, at the age of 58. He’s quite a remarkable character!

From a Sport Psychology point of view, Bruce believed that the key to coaching a distance athlete’s success was through tuning into their individual motivation. He felt this should be done by setting successive goals over time, varying training regime and setting different periodisation through the year. He offered good advice about how coaches should build young runners up, from their late teens, through University or higher education using mainly interval work, before upping their mileage totals in their early twenties.

Bud also concurred that at the point in life when top University athletes in the UK leave University (or return from countries such as the US where they have received great coaching) juggling the commitments of full time work and pushing on to the next level of running and achievement is difficult to manage. However, both believed that as successful UK distance runners in the 80s and 90s had shown, the talent within the country exists.

In Bud's opinion, when I asked him his views on Sport Psychology and what the most important mental aspect of coaching was, he stated it was building up a runner’s confidence. This should be done through soft skills, one to one with athletes, that naturally varies given an individual's nature and temperament, level of experience, and how a coach brings them along in a season and career. For instance, he cited that sticking a developing athlete into the London Marathon as one of their first races would be counterproductive. This is because it is likely they would come further down the field to elite athletes for whom the race is prestigious and where they may have had prior experience. This could dent a young athlete's confidence and subsequent results in later races.

Instead, he thought it better to identify a less well known marathon in mainland Europe where a top finish was more likely early in a runner's career. "Following up" with athletes was seen as crucial by Bud. He said he thought the current system lets down young athletes as they transition through their career, and it is the support team around them, under the guidance of coaches that helps determine runner’s success, both immediately after races and through each season.

Both Bud and Bruce made reference to the success of Kenyan runners. Peter McHugh from Victoria Park Harriers gave an impassioned talk about his recent trip to some training facilities there. All highlighted the benefit of group training amongst runners of similar ability (regardless of club affiliation) and how matching runners of similar, or slightly better standard against each other, raised the quality of all. The stats produced for 'average' Kenyan runners were staggering. From their finish times across different distances, to the level of their training facilities (or lack of them - running on dirt tracks, up to 300 runners at one time), to their stamina (running up to 3 times a day) and using sheer mountain tracks to test their strength.

Overall, it was a fantastic day. In my formal write up I'll include more stats on what was recommended, so if you are a distance runner yourself you can benefit from the knowledge shared on the day. Please email or message me if you want more info.

Monday, November 30, 2009

Hooray to the grey patches in life!

So it's been a long time since I bothered to write anything on the blog, and a few people (myself being one of them) has been asking, "So now you've finished your Masters, what are you going to do?"


The simple answer is to aim to become a Sport Psychologist! It's going to take a while though. I'm being supervised under BASES accreditation. BASES are "the professional body for sport and exercise sciences in the UK." Me and a group of other trainee Sport Psychs - under the guidance of an approved senior Psychologist - do our work with athletes (at whatever pace we feel comfortable at over two to three years) in order to meet the criteria laid down by BASES to become effective practitioners.


After a year of study though, I can't afford to try and take on clients straight away and earn a living off it. So I've gone back to my 'old' career and work at a very well .com, helping them with strategy and growth in 2010 onwards. It's a great place, full of clever folk, doing innovative stuff that challenges me. But it doesn't get me as energised and excited as the Psych work I do. I've been trying to think about what the real difference is between the 2 disciplines. Whilst I think it'll take me a while to fully see what the differences are, I came across the blog of one of my favourite bands and what their lead singer said about 'life online' these days. I like it very much.


"So i'm making a record, as previously blathered about, and this means that my horrible, useless website is getting redone by my friend sonya. i mean, it sucks, which was my choice. i was like "can this look more horrible?" i wish i was kidding, but i happen to like crap. i just do. but she's promised to work with me to make sure it's still unwieldy and awkward, which is good preparation for everything else lcdish, and i promise to be less grumpy about things actually being “useful”. it’s just that things that are too “useful”... well, i don’t entirely trust them. i kind of like useless things. for instance—and this is a pretty facile and simplified metaphor here—art is useless, and nazis made lots of useful things. i like dumb meandering things that make me happy and confused, and don’t particularly like “effective marketing tools designed for maximum accurate data capture” blah blah blah. it all sounds so sad and functional. i don’t like the idea of people sitting in a room talking about the best way to word things to get the right reaction from a base of “users” etc. i don’t like thinking that those people used to love to do something, or wanted to be something, and would up measuring the best way to manipulate other people. i honestly don’t judge them, but i feel weird, and sort of sad—not FOR them, in a pitying way, as i have no idea how they fell, for fuck’s sake, and i’m a ridiculous person by the measure of a pretty deep cut of the population—but ABOUT them.


So my take is this. I'm a bloke. One who thinks logically and in a structured way at work, where things are black and white. I'm paid to understand how the business is right now; how it will be tomorrow, how it needs to grow, and how to achieve these things through process. I'm good at process. Not wanting to bite the hand that feeds, but throughout the last 10 years of work in 'business' I feel like this guy at times.


In 'real' life, and in particular in people's sport and exercise, there is definite grey. Where performance and mindset isn't so clear cut (and clinical). Sometimes it makes me uneasy to know what I should do. Should I just listen to people articulate their World? Should I offer advice/judgement and/or intervention? Working that out, with people is really exciting. It requires real effort and appreciation of other peoples Worlds and how they construct them. I only have had limited experience so far. I've been frustrated trying to understand what the role of a Sport Psychologist is. What I do know is that it, deep down inside, when I'm practicing, it feels the right thing to be doing. I'm by no means the finished article. Quite the opposite. But what this blog entry by James Murphy reminds me of is what Tim Holder advises trainee sport psychs. That is you have to get used to working in the grey in this field. To feel uneasy, unsure and take your time in order to be effective.


I'll try and write more about this another time and give some concrete examples. For now though, trust me on this one!

After new year, I'll be writing on:
  • What is Sport Psychology?
  • What kinds of approaches are there to Sport Psychology?
  • What is my approach to Sport Psychology and practice?
  • What kinds of work are there in the Sport Psychology field?
  • What are the ethical considerations you need as a Sport Psychologist?
  • What is 'success' in Sport Psychology?
  • and, where I can (within the bounds of confidentiality), I'll write on how practice is going.

Please note - the views contained within this post reflect those of the author and not those of the organisations Stuart works for.